<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Your Geek News &#187; Period</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.yourgeeknews.com/category/period/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.yourgeeknews.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 17:58:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>PIRATES 4 REVIEW: Yes, But Are They BETTER Tides?</title>
		<link>http://www.yourgeeknews.com/pirates-4-review/</link>
		<comments>http://www.yourgeeknews.com/pirates-4-review/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 May 2011 15:24:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Geeks</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Action]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Epic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Historical]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Period]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pirate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sequel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[4]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Caribbean]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cruz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Depp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Johnny]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Penelope]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pirates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stranger]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tides]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yourgeeknews.com/?p=304</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[No Orlando and no Kiera? But we get McShane and Cruz instead? Sounds like a good recipe, but going back to the well after the trilogy has been told is risky. We&#8217;re hearing any subsequent Pirates films will be strictly one-offs, so let&#8217;s talk about how they set the precedent with &#8220;On Stranger Tides&#8221;! ~Matt [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><center><iframe src="http://blip.tv/play/0naCv_kuAA.html" width="640" height="390" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" src="http://a.blip.tv/api.swf#0naCv_kuAA" style="display:none"></embed></center></p>
<p>No Orlando and no Kiera? But we get McShane and Cruz instead? Sounds like a good recipe, but going back to the well after the trilogy has been told is risky. We&#8217;re hearing any subsequent Pirates films will be strictly one-offs, so let&#8217;s talk about how they set the precedent with &#8220;On Stranger Tides&#8221;!</p>
<p>~<a href="http://mattcampagna.com/" target="_blank">Matt</a> + <a href="http://anastasiatubanos.com"  target="_blank">Nat</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.yourgeeknews.com/pirates-4-review/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>PRINCE OF PERSIA REVIEW: Huh. Whaddya know? Jake&#8217;s an Action Star!</title>
		<link>http://www.yourgeeknews.com/prince-of-persia-review-huh-whaddya-know-jakes-an-action-star/</link>
		<comments>http://www.yourgeeknews.com/prince-of-persia-review-huh-whaddya-know-jakes-an-action-star/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 May 2010 23:10:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Geeks</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[80's]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Action]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Adaptation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Historical]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Period]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[video game]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2003]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2010]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alfred molina]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ben kingsley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[clips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[game]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gemma arterton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jake gyllenhaal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[matt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[movie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[prince of persia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sands of time]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scenes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ubisoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[watch]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yourgeeknews.com/?p=211</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The difference between a successful yet soulless blockbuster and a well-crafted film that&#8217;s marketed blockbuster is sometimes ignored by movie studios with dollar-signs in their eyes. But in the case of Prince of Persia, Disney and Bruckheimer actually created a piece of entertainment with some heart, a strong story and some great characters to go [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><center><embed src="http://blip.tv/play/0naB4qsRAA%2Em4v" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="640" height="390" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></center><br />
The difference between a successful yet soulless blockbuster and a well-crafted film that&#8217;s marketed blockbuster is sometimes ignored by movie studios with dollar-signs in their eyes. But in the case of Prince of Persia, Disney and Bruckheimer actually created a piece of entertainment with some heart, a strong story and some great characters to go along with a heaping serving of action-packed video game inspired eye-candy! </p>
<p>~<a href="http://mattcampagna.com/" target="_blank">Matt</a> + <a href="http://anastasiatubanos.com"  target="_blank">Nat</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.yourgeeknews.com/prince-of-persia-review-huh-whaddya-know-jakes-an-action-star/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>PRINCE OF PERSIA THE FORGOTTEN SANDS REVIEW</title>
		<link>http://www.yourgeeknews.com/prince-of-persia-game-review/</link>
		<comments>http://www.yourgeeknews.com/prince-of-persia-game-review/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 May 2010 02:21:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Geeks</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Action]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fantasy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Period]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prequel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PS3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sequel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[video game]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yourgeeknews.com/?p=214</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Prince of Persia: The Forgotten Sands blew us away from a gameplay standpoint, and delivered solidly on Graphics and Story! Not only is this one of Matt&#8217;s favourite types of games, this review also introduces our geek rating system! Leave us a comment and let us know what you think of our geek-o-meter&#8230; ~Matt + [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><center><embed src="http://blip.tv/play/0naB4uAkAA%2Em4v" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="640" height="390" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></center></p>
<p>Prince of Persia: The Forgotten Sands blew us away from a gameplay standpoint, and delivered solidly on Graphics and Story! Not only is this one of Matt&#8217;s favourite types of games, this review also introduces our geek rating system! Leave us a comment and let us know what you think of our geek-o-meter&#8230;</p>
<p>~<a href="http://mattcampagna.com/" target="_blank">Matt</a> + <a href="http://anastasiatubanos.com"  target="_blank">Nat</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.yourgeeknews.com/prince-of-persia-game-review/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>ROBIN HOOD REVIEW: Hold on&#8230; That Wasn&#8217;t Robin Hood!</title>
		<link>http://www.yourgeeknews.com/robinhood_review/</link>
		<comments>http://www.yourgeeknews.com/robinhood_review/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 May 2010 20:23:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Geeks</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Action]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Adaptation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Epic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fantasy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Historical]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Period]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prequel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2010]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cate blanchet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[film]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gladiator]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[movie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[remake]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[revenge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ridley scott]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[robin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[russell crowe]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yourgeeknews.com/?p=203</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ridley Scott and Russell Crowe make a great team. Just look at Gladiator. Really. We mean it, skip Robin Hood and just go watch Gladiator. This movie is so BARELY a story of Robin Hood, it hardly deserves the name, and winds up being little more than a re-tread of Scott&#8217;s previous epic work. Everyone [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><center><embed src="http://blip.tv/play/0naB369YAA%2Em4v" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="640" height="390" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></center></p>
<p>Ridley Scott and Russell Crowe make a great team. Just look at Gladiator. Really. We mean it, skip Robin Hood and just go watch Gladiator. This movie is so BARELY a story of Robin Hood, it hardly deserves the name, and winds up being little more than a re-tread of Scott&#8217;s previous epic work. Everyone phoned it in on this one, folks; don&#8217;t waste your time.</p>
<p>~<a href="http://mattcampagna.com/" target="_blank">Matt</a> + <a href="http://anastasiatubanos.com"  target="_blank">Nat</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.yourgeeknews.com/robinhood_review/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>ALICE IN WONDERLAND REVIEW: Burton 1, Carroll 0</title>
		<link>http://www.yourgeeknews.com/alice-in-wonderland-review/</link>
		<comments>http://www.yourgeeknews.com/alice-in-wonderland-review/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 08:06:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Geeks</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Drama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fantasy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Period]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[3D]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Adaptation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alice in wonderland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[avatar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[book]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[burton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[helena bonham carter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[johnny depp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lewis carroll]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mia wasikowska]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[movie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[remake]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sequel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tim]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yourgeeknews.com/?p=163</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tim Burton definitely pushed even his own imagination to a new level and a new dimension. But did any of Lewis Carroll&#8217;s legendary work of fiction make it to the silver screen intact? Characters seem to come across true to form, albeit a bit more Scottish, but Tim Burton is true to his word when [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><center><embed src="http://blip.tv/play/0naBzNtXAA%2Em4v" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="640" height="390" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></center><br />
Tim Burton definitely pushed even his own imagination to a new level and a new dimension. But did any of Lewis Carroll&#8217;s legendary work of fiction make it to the silver screen intact? Characters seem to come across true to form, albeit a bit more Scottish, but Tim Burton is true to his word when he claimed this would be an entirely new story for Alice&#8230; far from an adaptation in plot and in spirit.</p>
<p>~<a href="http://mattcampagna.com/" target="_blank">Matt</a> + <a href="http://anastasiatubanos.com"  target="_blank">Nat</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.yourgeeknews.com/alice-in-wonderland-review/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>ALICE IN WONDERLAND PREVIEW: Tim Burton in 3-D!</title>
		<link>http://www.yourgeeknews.com/alice-in-wonderland-preview/</link>
		<comments>http://www.yourgeeknews.com/alice-in-wonderland-preview/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 02:00:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Geeks</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Adaptation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Exclusive Clips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fantasy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Interview]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Period]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2010]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[3D]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[actress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anne Hathaway]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[beetlejuice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[clips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Crispin Glover]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[director]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[edward scissorhands]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[film]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Helena Bonhma Carter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[imagination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[johnny depp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mad Hatter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plays]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Queen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Queen of Hearts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Red Queen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reimagined]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tim Burton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[White]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wonderland]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yourgeeknews.com/?p=152</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#8217;s one thing to put a tool like 3-D in the hands of a man like James Cameron, who delicately and gracefully gives the audience a subtle feeling of depth. It is quite another to give it to a visionary auteur who is famous for breaking all the rules and letting his wild imagination loose [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><center><embed src="http://blip.tv/play/0naByttXAA%2Em4v" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="640" height="390" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></center><br />
It&#8217;s one thing to put a tool like 3-D in the hands of a man like James Cameron, who delicately and gracefully gives the audience a subtle feeling of depth. It is quite another to give it to a visionary auteur who is famous for breaking all the rules and letting his wild imagination loose on unsuspecting viewers, and with Tim Burton&#8217;s take on the tale of Alice in Wonderland, we can expect him to have pulled out all the stops&#8230; if he ever had any.</p>
<p>Re-teaming with Disney, Johnny Depp and Helena Bonham Carter, this new vision of Alice and her Wonderland have both taken on a distinctly Burton flavour that is sure to make it singularly unique. On top of the visual style, Burton has concocted an entirely new story for Alice. Yes, you read that correctly, Lewis Carroll&#8217;s beloved text has been tossed out the window, leaving only the characters themselves to contend with Tim&#8217;s wild imagination. Sounds like a fair fight to us!</p>
<p>~<a href="http://mattcampagna.com/" target="_blank">Matt</a> + <a href="http://anastasiatubanos.com"  target="_blank">Nat</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.yourgeeknews.com/alice-in-wonderland-preview/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>THE WOLFMAN REVIEW: Improve Upon A Classic? Oh Yes.</title>
		<link>http://www.yourgeeknews.com/wolfman-review/</link>
		<comments>http://www.yourgeeknews.com/wolfman-review/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 07:36:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Geeks</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[40's]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Historical]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Horror]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Period]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[remake]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supernatural]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Werewolf]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1941]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2010]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aberline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anthony]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[asylum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[beast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[benicio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blackmoor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cane]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chaney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[del]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fight]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hopkins]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hugo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[inspector]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[joe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[johnston]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[man]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[silver]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[talbot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[toro]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[weaving]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wolf]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wolfman]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yourgeeknews.com/?p=148</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Let&#8217;s preface this review with the fact that Matt is quite possibly one of the biggest werewolf aficionado&#8217;s on the planet, having watched any and every lycanthropic-film in the last hundred years. And nothing but nothing compares to The Wolf-Man. Except, of course, The Wolfman. Faithful in all the right ways, and yet unafraid to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><center><embed src="http://blip.tv/play/0naBxqZkAA%2Em4v" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="640" height="390" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></center><br />
Let&#8217;s preface this review with the fact that Matt is quite possibly one of the biggest werewolf aficionado&#8217;s on the planet, having watched any and every lycanthropic-film in the last hundred years. And nothing but nothing compares to The Wolf-Man. Except, of course, The Wolfman. Faithful in all the right ways, and yet unafraid to weave a more complex storyline with more extreme Werewolf rampages, an even more foreign origin story, and an ending that will knock your socks off. Yes, that&#8217;s right, there&#8217;s a new Wolfman in Blackmoor, Chaney, and he can howl with the best of them.</p>
<p>~<a href="http://mattcampagna.com/" target="_blank">Matt</a> + <a href="http://anastasiatubanos.com"  target="_blank">Nat</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.yourgeeknews.com/wolfman-review/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>18</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>THE WOLFMAN PREVIEW: 70 Years and Still Scary</title>
		<link>http://www.yourgeeknews.com/wolfmanpreview/</link>
		<comments>http://www.yourgeeknews.com/wolfmanpreview/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 19:34:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Geeks</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[40's]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Historical]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Period]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Preview]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[remake]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supernatural]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Werewolf]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1941]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2010]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anthony hopkins]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[benicio del toro]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[classic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[emily blunt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wolf man]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yourgeeknews.com/?p=145</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nearly 70 years after Lon Chaney Jr. first howled at the moon, Benicio Del Toro is slipping into his signature hair, ears and underbite to bring the classic Universal monster to life in Joe Johnston&#8217;s remake of The Wolf Man. With Anthony Hopkins, Hugo Weaving and Emily Blunt along for the ride, and the visual [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><center><embed src="http://blip.tv/play/0naBw_c%2BAA%2Em4v" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="640" height="390" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></center></p>
<p>Nearly 70 years after Lon Chaney Jr. first howled at the moon, Benicio Del Toro is slipping into his signature hair, ears and underbite to bring the classic Universal monster to life in Joe Johnston&#8217;s remake of The Wolf Man. With Anthony Hopkins, Hugo Weaving and Emily Blunt along for the ride, and the visual effects make-up artist behind The Howling and An American Werewolf in London, it looks like this remake has got some serious teeth.</p>
<p>~<a href="http://mattcampagna.com/" target="_blank">Matt</a> + <a href="http://anastasiatubanos.com"  target="_blank">Nat</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.yourgeeknews.com/wolfmanpreview/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>SHERLOCK HOLMES PREVIEW: Victorian Street Elementary, My Dear Watson</title>
		<link>http://www.yourgeeknews.com/sherlock-preview/</link>
		<comments>http://www.yourgeeknews.com/sherlock-preview/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 23:49:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Geeks</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Adaptation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Historical]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Period]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Preview]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supernatural]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2009]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[barells]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[clips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[director]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[film]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[guy ritchie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[holmes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Interview]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jude law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lock stock barrels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[london]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[movie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rachel mcadams]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[robert downey jr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scenes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sherlock]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[snatch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[steampunk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trailer]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yourgeeknews.com/?p=119</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you&#8217;re looking for a director who can completely erase stuffy, old British boredom, you don&#8217;t have to go any further than Guy Ritchie. And so giving him the reigns to Sir Arthur Conan Doyle&#8217;s famous Victorian detective seems like something of an inspired gamble. With Robert Downey Jr and Jude Law taking the roles [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><center><embed src="http://blip.tv/play/0naBuLheAA%2Em4v" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="640" height="390" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></center><br />
If you&#8217;re looking for a director who can completely erase stuffy, old British boredom, you don&#8217;t have to go any further than Guy Ritchie. And so giving him the reigns to Sir Arthur Conan Doyle&#8217;s famous Victorian detective seems like something of an inspired gamble. With Robert Downey Jr and Jude Law taking the roles of Holmes and Watson, and Canadian starlet Rachel McAdams playing a deliciously villainous love interest, the cast is as strong as the source material, but we&#8217;ll have to wait until Christmas to see what&#8217;s inside the packaging.</p>
<p>~<a href="http://mattcampagna.com/" target="_blank">Matt</a> + <a href="http://anastasiatubanos.com"  target="_blank">Nat</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.yourgeeknews.com/sherlock-preview/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

