<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: INGLOURIOUS BASTERDS PREVIEW: Tarantino&#8217;s Macaroni Combat</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.yourgeeknews.com/inglourious-basterds-preview/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.yourgeeknews.com/inglourious-basterds-preview/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 23:51:38 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Hassan</title>
		<link>http://www.yourgeeknews.com/inglourious-basterds-preview/comment-page-1/#comment-1992</link>
		<dc:creator>Hassan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 19:49:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yourgeeknews.com/?p=28#comment-1992</guid>
		<description>Hey guys ,

love your views , 
i had posted this same thing on imdb.com
please tell me if i am correct or not, i had only one little problem with the film, OK forgive me for my ignorance regarding Tarintino&#039;s philosophy behind the movie, i know that the movie was more fiction and less fact, but not to be judgemental, i know that the Natzis deserve what they got, but from the film perspective, apart from the beginning (shooting the floor in the first chapter) , there was no ..mmm...how should i put it &quot; proof to the viewers that the Natzis were bad and deserved what they got &quot; by my honest view, (keeping actual history aside), i believe Tarintino showed the Jews more violent and merciless rather than the other way around in the film ( i.e. the scalping ).

But non the less i loved the movie , the characters were superb, and let me just say that i believe Col. Hans Landa ( Waltz ) to be the Best Tarintino Villain of all time.

Other of favourite characters were Pitt ( Lt. Aldo ), Fassbender ( Lt. Archie Hicox )And it was funny to see Mike Myers in the movie...!!! 



see ya !</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey guys ,</p>
<p>love your views ,<br />
i had posted this same thing on imdb.com<br />
please tell me if i am correct or not, i had only one little problem with the film, OK forgive me for my ignorance regarding Tarintino&#8217;s philosophy behind the movie, i know that the movie was more fiction and less fact, but not to be judgemental, i know that the Natzis deserve what they got, but from the film perspective, apart from the beginning (shooting the floor in the first chapter) , there was no ..mmm&#8230;how should i put it &#8221; proof to the viewers that the Natzis were bad and deserved what they got &#8221; by my honest view, (keeping actual history aside), i believe Tarintino showed the Jews more violent and merciless rather than the other way around in the film ( i.e. the scalping ).</p>
<p>But non the less i loved the movie , the characters were superb, and let me just say that i believe Col. Hans Landa ( Waltz ) to be the Best Tarintino Villain of all time.</p>
<p>Other of favourite characters were Pitt ( Lt. Aldo ), Fassbender ( Lt. Archie Hicox )And it was funny to see Mike Myers in the movie&#8230;!!! </p>
<p>see ya !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
